Hi Greg,
On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 at 13:53, Greg Hogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think we are on the same wavelength [1] about upgrading GCD 001. To
>> do so, I propose to first draft a GCD for amending accepted GCDs.
>
> Why would we need a new amending GCD when we already have GCD 001? Can
> we not simply approve changes in a GCD?
Do we want to run a complete GCD for adjusting 001? For example, it
reads:
4. Submit the GCD as a patch to `[email protected]`.
which is now irrelevant. This needs to be “trivially” adjusted and we
do not need to wait at least 30+14 days for processing such change,
IMHO. However, we cannot modify – even trivial tweaks – without
following an explicit process; Otherwise it soaps a slippery slope.
Somehow, we need a “light” process for amending accepted GCDs. And this
“light” process needs a GCD to be defined.
Well, it’s how I understand the thing. Maybe people have a different
opinions. Hence drafting a GCD for amending accepted GCDs seems the way
to drive such discussion, IMHO. ;-)
Cheers,
simon
