On 2025-11-20 11:12, Brendan Tildesley wrote:
On the mailing list web interface, when I want to reply to an email, I click Reply To ..., but it opens up a new email in my mail client with To: set to directly email that person rather than the list, does not include the subject, or body to reply to.

I have been perpetually bewildered by the email process ever since I first started contributing. I feel like there is nothing wrong with email per-se, but the clients and interfaces we use often seem allergic to convenience.

It seems that to reply to an an email on, say, guix-devel, one can:

A) Have already previously subscribed to the list so that the email can be correctly replied to -- This is a bit unrealistic. If you're not already subscribed how do you respond to previous emails?

B) Manually copy paste information from the html source code, or mbox archive to set To:, CC: etc. --  I've done this many times but it feels a bit ridiculous.

C) Download the mbox archives and import into email client -- Seems to work, but the archives may not be refreshed for emails from 5 minutes ago.


Is there some reason why a simple "reply via email" button can't Just Work(tm)? Especially if I'm on mobile and want to quickly reply to something. Or am i missing something obvious?


Hi,

I suppose you talk about this one:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2025-11/msg00081.html

Clicking reply redirects you to:

mailto:[email protected]?In-Reply-To=afca466b-6b0e-4f7a-ac17-12dc91a4fecf%40brendan.scot&Subject=Mailing%20list%20%22reply%20via%20email%22%20inconvenience.

Which in my case sets the Subject properly. Maybe it's your email client that doesn't know how to deal with the link.

I don't know if we have access to this mailing list software to change that to include a button for "reply-to-list". Do we? or is it just managed by GNU?

I think we can even add the body:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6068

But email clients have to support that, of course, and we need to have access to the mailing list software, which is an infrastructure that I don't know if we manage.

Best,
Ekaitz


Reply via email to