>ven. 08 août 2025 at 13:15, Gabriel Wicki <gabr...@erlikon.ch> wrote:
> Hey! > > Maxim Cournoyer <ma...@guixotic.coop> writes: >> My main objections are: >> >> 1) The global tag namespace of the repo would quickly (or at some pace) >> become messy, as branches are merged often >> >> 2) Merge commits would serve that exact purpose without incurring 1), so >> it seems we should just use that > > I understand and agree with you, Maxim! Tagging merges makes little to > no sense, we should rather just use merge commits, which actually > already happens (sometimes). For us developers this could help a bunch, > especially when we try to figure out why problems in the code base were > introduced. I’m late to the party, but I always though that merge commits of team branches were the obvious way to go to that matter. And I always understood that, if Guix took the decision to keep solely a linear history, was due to a good reason which I ignore, originating back in time. This reason is still valid ? What has changed since ? C.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
