Hi, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
> Hi Danny, > > I think you’re describing the problem that others pointed out earlier > (there’s an open bug report IIRC) which is that grafting derivations do > not necessarily produce all the outputs of the original derivation (so > in one case you get a grafted ‘glib’ with just “out”, and in the other > case a grafted ‘glib’ with “out”, “debug”, “static”, and “bin”. > > As a consequence, the GIR program ends up dlopening two different > libglib.so. > > I believe this was discussed in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75157>. > Perhaps we should start from there, possibly considering a revert or > change of strategy of commit 482fda2729c3e76999892cb8f9a0391a7bd37119. I think we should revert that commit until we can revisit. It has caused enough long-standing issues and the gain of having it appears small. -- Thanks, Maxim
