On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 02:41:37PM +0200, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi Ludo, > > On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 14:21, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > 3. I’m reluctant about using <filesystem> because the few functions > > you mention are security-sensitive. We would need to look at the > > implementation of libstdc++ and perhaps at the spec to see whether > > their counterpart is appropriate. > > I’m not sure to follow because the implementation of libstdc++ appears > to me more secure / optimized than their counterpart, no?
I'd assume the code shipped in GCC that we'd be linking against for the standard library is good. Plus we're not updating the vendored code as it is. -- Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
