On 2025-06-03, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Vagrant Cascadian <vagr...@debian.org> writes: >> > git push --set-upstream origin vagrantc-test ... >> remote: Forgejo: User permission denied for writing. >> To codeberg.org:guix/guix.git >> ! [remote rejected] vagrantc-test -> vagrantc-test (pre-receive >> hook declined) >> error: failed to push some refs to 'codeberg.org:guix/guix.git' > > I have a lead: I wonder if being part of a team that has read-only code > access (all teams do) prevails over being a “collaborator” with write > access. > > https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/383#issuecomment-4974834 > > Could you check this hypothesis by removing yourself from the team(s) > you’re on (except “owners”)?
I am not on the "owners" team. I do not see "collaborators" defined anywhere, but admittedly do not really know where to look. I did find something marking me as part of the "embedded" team. (but not "reproduciblebuilds" as defined in etc/teams.scm) live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
