Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> writes: > >> I wonder how this compares to storing and serving a mirror of the Git >> repository. Maybe that's a bit more complicated in terms of the setup, >> but it may perform better than a redirect and actually provide >> redundancy? > > Good point. I think mirroring would be good, but if and only if we can > synchronize it at every push rather than periodically (current mirror is > periodic).
Using the fancy GitHub/Forgejo Actions thing, I think that should be possible. > Regardless, I think the priority is to decide on whether this DNS entry > is the way to go, so we can use it in (guix channels) on the day we > switch. > > Once git.guix.gnu.org is in place, we can always change its > implementation from redirect to mirroring. > > WDYT? Good point, personally I'm pro using a domain we control for the Git repository going forward, so yeah, I'm happy to see this setup so that we can test it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
