Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> writes: > I suppose if a project had releases but didn't tag the releases in the > git repo then the github updater would be preferable, but that's the > only example I can think of where we'd necessarily need the github > updater.
Is that scenario even possible? Looking at the GitHub API documentation for creating a release[0] the tag_name is a required field. I guess you *could* create all the releases against one single tag and attach the per-release assets to them, but I am not sure that is something we need to support (and I *hope* no one does that). Tomas 0: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/releases/releases#create-a-release -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
