On Sun, Mar 02 2025, Carlo Zancanaro wrote:
> Thinking about this some more, I wonder if there's a better way to do
> this than hard-coding this specific option. This seems like a more
> general issue, where someone wants to modify a "hidden" shepherd
> service in some way that's specific to their system.

Here's another patch to pass through another option for the Wireguard
shepherd service: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/77045

It would be nice to have a more general mechanism for this. If nobody
has any thoughts then I'll put together a patch adding shepherd service
finalizers and I guess we'll see what happens.

Carlo

Reply via email to