On Sun, Mar 02 2025, Carlo Zancanaro wrote: > Thinking about this some more, I wonder if there's a better way to do > this than hard-coding this specific option. This seems like a more > general issue, where someone wants to modify a "hidden" shepherd > service in some way that's specific to their system.
Here's another patch to pass through another option for the Wireguard shepherd service: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/77045 It would be nice to have a more general mechanism for this. If nobody has any thoughts then I'll put together a patch adding shepherd service finalizers and I guess we'll see what happens. Carlo