Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > As for experimenting, I agree and I reiterate my invitation to send > trivial patches to <https://codeberg.org/civodul/guix> (or to > Guix-Science, Guix-Past, etc.). I think this GCD’s discussion period is > the right time to give it a try as it can better inform discussions.
Based on Andreas's observations in [1]: #+caption: <https://yhetil.org/guix/Z8rJyIIUR84pWdLS@jurong/> #+begin_quote On the other hand, as soon as there is a patch series on issues, it also becomes more or less unreadable; after 5 versions of a 6-patch series, it becomes difficult to find the start of the current version and all comments in between. #+end_quote It seems if we are basing our experimentations on only "trivial patches" that are sent to <https://codeberg.org/civodul/guix>, we may not be observing the instances where a forge-style review process actually struggles; our conclusions may be flawed. [1]: <https://yhetil.org/guix/Z8rJyIIUR84pWdLS@jurong/> -- Suhail
