On 2025-03-04 12:22, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
- The flow would be*even* more confusing than now, since it'd look
like Github but require committers to use it very differently.
This is a very interesting take.
I have a similar view when we mention A-Git-Flow or whatever that is.
We would be using a tool in a very surprising way. I don't know if
that's good, at all.
We would be pushing that complexity only to committers, not to ocasional
contributors, which may help attracting people. But, on the other hand,
we would force people who is already very busy (and very efficient with
their current workflow) to discard their way to do things and learn another.
I like the proposal, but at the same time, I feel very comfortable with
Guix due to the fact that I can collaborate with email only (I even
decided to use the same model for my projects!).
Some of the things we have are very disturbing though: savannah is
weird, patches being mixed with issues, debbugs is not very comfortable
to use... I think that would be improved with Codeberg.
I don't know if this adds anything, but there it is.
Cheers,
Ekaitz
