Hi Florian, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflor...@pelzflorian.de> writes:
[...] > Does this mean we can no longer refer to a 'glib-or-gtk-wrap phase? > Judging from Maxim’s comment <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75688#34>, > >> In its current form, this phase should be renamed >> 'write-search-path-files' or similar; we could introduce a deprecated >> symbol for wrap-all-programs for backward compatibility. > > we would rename the phase. > Which is possible, but might impact third-party channel. The mentioned deprecated wrap-all-programs symbol would deal with that for the time being, so I do not see an issue there (note: we also are not bound to not breaking 3rd party channels as mentioned in our doc, although we shouldn't do so lightly of course). -- Thanks, Maxim
