Hi Maxim,

> That's probably the GCC implicitly added by gnu-build-system, which is
> listed in the %final-inputs variable.

I did figure out that this was the GCC implicitly added by `gnu-build-system`, 
although unfortunately examining this more carefully didn't help me a whole lot 
with understanding why it seemed to be non-substitutable. 

> I'm not sure what's wrong, but I think we could start by investigating
> why this changes causes 29 new failures when running:

I accidentally added an extra closing parenthesis to the changed line in 
`derivation`, but didn't bother submitting an updated patch set because even 
with that typo fixed, the change still didn't seem to work. You may have 
noticed and fixed this yourself. I had trouble running the test suite while 
working on the changes, as I was away from home and my laptop seemed to be 
somewhat underpowered for the purpose. I'm back at home with access to my PC 
now, so I'll try to have a look at why the tests are failing.

Best,

Morgan

              • ... Maxim Cournoyer
          • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Understanding... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
    • Re: Understa... Maxime Devos
    • Re: Understa... Andreas Enge
      • Re: Unde... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
        • Re: ... Maxim Cournoyer
          • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
            • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
              • ... Maxim Cournoyer
              • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
              • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
              • ... Maxim Cournoyer
              • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.

Reply via email to