On +2025-01-09 18:33:16 +0100, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 at 11:40, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > Yes, would be nice if some of you reading this could offer to become > > “supporters”. > > [...] > > > Please take a look, comment, offer your name as a “supporter”, and then > > make your voice heard during the deliberation period! > > I think we need to clarify what means “supporter”. In my mind, a > Supporter is a person that commits to help the Author in crossing the > final line. > > During the Discussion Period, we discuss, all. The aim of Supporter is > to keep the RFC on track. Especially, to let space and time to all to > express their voice. Nix names this Role: Shepherd. Maybe it captures > better the idea. > > Then during the Deliberation Period, team members reply “I support”. > > WDYT? > > BTW, I like “Guix Common Document“ [1] instead of Request-For-Comment as > suggested by pukkamustard. >
I like <https://www.etymonline.com/word/parliament#etymonline_v_7228> I'm imagining a virtual virtuous BDFL (VVBDFL) of a Guix or Guile project with the parliament trying to influence the VVBDFL's decisions/commits. I imagine a game engine could make it almost live, but the dialog stream should always be available in parallel as text packets (unicode paragraphs a la TeX?) for easy archiving and searching. I prefer minimal cruft and easy greppability :) So how about <project-name>-parliament ? > > Cheers, > simon > > 1: [post Guix Days] Guix Common Document (was: Request-For-Comment process) > Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> > Sat, 03 Feb 2024 11:34:13 +0100 > id:87y1c1kfa2....@gmail.com > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-02 > https://yhetil.org/guix/87y1c1kfa2....@gmail.com >
