Richard Stallman <r...@gnu.org> writes: > That is so much simpler than what Guix has to do that using Guix for > this would be a quick and dirty hack.
There's no denying that using Guix isn't necessary. However, to be clear, Guix does already distribute Info manuals (standalone and otherwise) today. While not necessary, I don't see why using Guix package manager would be a "dirty hack". > The task here can be done with something much simpler Even for those manuals that would require conversion from a different documentation system such as Sphinx? What do you propose ought to be used to manage the build environment needs for such tasks? -- Suhail
