Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes: >> Over the years, consensus emerged that ‘core-updates’, as a branch where >> we lump together all sorts of rebuild-the-world changes, is no longer >> sustainable. > > So, uh, how should I sent patches for that? Before, I was able to mark > patches as intended for core-updates. But since that branch is no more, > what should I do? Where should we, non-committers, who do not have a > dedicated "focused" branch, send patches that cause a lot of rebuilds?
You can still mark them, but instead of using "core-updates" you'd use whatever team the package relates to. -- Ricardo
