Hi, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes: [...] >> Maybe I am missing something. To my knowledge, .go files produced by >> Guile are not always reproducible, see bug#20272 [1]. And, from my >> understanding, Guix cannot be reproducible until this bug had been >> fixed. Therefore, I am not convinced that this patch is worth under >> this frame considering the build-time penalty it brings. >> >> That’s said, maybe it’s better than nothing and the package ’guix’ is >> barely built after all. I do not know. >> >> What people think? > > Perhaps we should set the default parallel-build? to #f in the > guile-build-system at least in the meantime, with a prominent comment as > to why and a reference to the upstream issue? Many Guile packages use > the gnu-build-system so that wouldn't cover all of them like > 'guix'... I'm not sure. Sounds good to me: packages using ‘guile-build-system’ are usually relatively small so the impact is negligible. ‘guix’ is a little different because it takes so much time to build sequentially… Ludo’.
