Hi Andreas, >> It looks like Guix picked the larger one by >> alphanumeric order, which is not a reasonable choice in a development >> context. > > This is exactly the role of the number "-0." in front of the git commit; > one needs to specify by hand the order of the (non-)releases, as coming
Good to know, thanks! I had been wondering what those revision numbers were good for. Manual ordering looks fine for updating packages in a given channel. But in this case, the two versions come from different channels. It's a bit hard to globally coordinate manual revision numbers across all possible channels! Cheers, Konrad.
