Hi,

John Kehayias <john.kehay...@protonmail.com> skribis:
> I did see that patch but didn't have a chance to do anything with it. I just 
> started (locally) on updating mesa to the latest version, so I was going to 
> rebase on core-updates (or master if core-updates is merged) and get that 
> ready to go.
>
> So I would say it is up to whoever is leading on core-updates, based on the 
> current substitute coverage. I would guess if it is ready to be merged, a 
> rebuild of ~5k packages due to vulkan would set things back a while. And I 
> can have a mesa-updates branch with that patch building everything soon after.

A dedicated branch right after ‘core-updates’ is merged sounds like the
way forward to me.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Reply via email to