Hi, John Kehayias <john.kehay...@protonmail.com> skribis:
> I did see that patch but didn't have a chance to do anything with it. I just > started (locally) on updating mesa to the latest version, so I was going to > rebase on core-updates (or master if core-updates is merged) and get that > ready to go. > > So I would say it is up to whoever is leading on core-updates, based on the > current substitute coverage. I would guess if it is ready to be merged, a > rebuild of ~5k packages due to vulkan would set things back a while. And I > can have a mesa-updates branch with that patch building everything soon after. A dedicated branch right after ‘core-updates’ is merged sounds like the way forward to me. Thanks, Ludo’.