Hi Sergio,

Sergio Pastor Pérez <sergio.pastorpe...@outlook.es> writes:

Hello Ian.

I cannot help you since I don't have commit access. But I want to thank
you for your hard work, I'm currently using your package.


Thank you for the kind words, they truly mean a lot to me.

Whatever the state of Guix proper, you can always find the current version of LibreWolf in my personal channel[1], though I don’t have a public substitute server, so long build times will await you if you choose this route.


We should try to come up with a solution that alleviates the burden on the maintainers. Given how often this issue arises, what if we try, as
a collective, to suggest new mechanisms that would improve the
situation?

If I recall correctly, someone suggested having a development branch in which, once the QA passes, the patches get automatically merged. I know some people rose concerns about the slowness of the QA system for this to be an effective solution, and there is also the issue ordering the
patch application.

If the previous solution is ruled out, I would like to know the opinion of the Guix community on a voting system. I'm imagining a system where we reuse the mailing infrastructure we have, where each accepted mail in the guix devel mailing list has 1 vote for a given patch, that way we avoid multiple votes from the same entity and would allow people without commit access, but active on the Guix development, to participate. So,
we could set up a threshold where if a patch gets 10 votes from
non-committers the merge would be done; preferably automated, but if it's not possible, committers would know what is ready to be merged without
effort and what the community wants.


I’m not sure this would be effective, because the QA service is unreliable. I regularly see patches which simply don’t get picked up by it, including many of my own. At other times, it lags very far behind. I don’t think it’s reliable enough to be in the critical path for anything. Guix is supposed to be a rolling-release distro, so it feels strange to have a develop branch which moves even faster.

Thanks,

 — Ian


[1]: https://codeberg.org/ieure/atomized-guix

Reply via email to