Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > 宋文武 <iyzs...@envs.net> skribis: > >> Hello, there are 399 build failed which only on core-updates if I count >> it correctly (1 at the end of each line come from ci status, I think 2 >> are for dependencies failed), the 4xxxxxx are build number, which can be >> used as "https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/4602867/details";. > > Thanks for all the work you’ve put last week into fixing these issues! > We’re at 94% of substitute availability on x86_64-linux right now: > > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/core-updates > > ci.guix is lagging behind on aarch64-linux (mostly because part of the > builders are out-of-order right now¹) and also on powerpc64le-linux > (that would need more investigation), but fortunately bordeaux.guix has > relatively good figures on these platforms. > > On i686-linux, there are two important packages failing: gd (1 test > failure) and libfaketime. Fixing these can make an important > difference. > > Let’s keep this going and we should be able to merge real soon, maybe as > soon as we get above 70% on aarch64 and powerpc64le? Is that a > reasonable goal?
I'm not sure about powerpc64le, I don't think I'll be able to run the one machine hooked up to the bordeaux build farm in the next few weeks.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
