On 2024-06-24 16:18, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: > Hi, > > On 2024-06-24 11:31, raingl...@riseup.net wrote: >> Since the email based workflow has put off quite a few potential >> contributors, maybe this could be a good distributed alternative: >> https://github.com/google/git-appraise >> >> Disclaimer: haven't tried it myself, also haven't tried packaging it. >> The Go and Rust dependencies could be hard to package with Guix's >> current tools. >> > > Arun is also developing a similar thing but it's not based on the git-notes > for the issue system. I don't remember the name, maybe he can talk more about > it. > > Also `fossil` does all this but "better" integrated. > > It's a very interesting thing to test but also our repo is already kind of > huge. If we merge all the issues and stuff in it... It might become even > gigantic. > > Also, the Mumi based workflow described here: > https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Debbugs-User-Interfaces.html#Command_002dline-interface > > ...is probably way better than using `git send-email` raw. WDYT? > > I started with `git send-email` not that long ago, and *I* didn't find the > workflow hard to follow. In fact, *I* think it's even easier than the PR > based thing that is widespread right now. > > I'm not saying it isn't true that there is people that was put off by the > email based workflow, but I'd like to know how many. > > In any case, it's a very interesting link! Thanks for sharing! > > Cheers!
This is specifically for code *review*, not issue tracking or simply sending patches. PR review was one of the major problems with the email tools that I've seen mentioned.
