Hi Tomas, On Sun, Jun 23 2024, Tomas Volf wrote:
> 1. I need the serializer for `name' field to wrap the output of other > serializers. Is it possible with nested configuration records (which I remember are complicated to set up)? > 2. I need to serialize key-file and key-type as one (since they belong on one > line). Yeah, I've had that issue, too. I am not sure the field-based serializers are a general solution. > I did not figure out how to achieve those except by a custom > procedure: This has the obvious maintenance issues though, so I think > it would be nice to be able to utilize the existing serializer > infrastructure for this I probably find the custom serializer, which is in one place, easier to understand than passing the record around, but I'm ready to be convinced otherwise. In any event, I'm a newbie so please feel free to disregard. Kind regards Felix
