Hi, On Monday, June 10th, 2024 at 2:26 AM, Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> wrote:
> > > Am Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 09:19:14PM -0400 schrieb Leo Famulari: > > > You're right, it was ZFS itself failing to build. > > *** ZFS Version: zfs-2.2.3-1 > > *** Compatible Kernels: 3.10 - 6.7 > > Should we change something about zfs-auto-snapshot? Or is the status quo > > okay? > > > Somebody has suggested an update to zfs, which apparently solves the > problem; both zfs and zfs-auto-snapshot now build according to QA: > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/71392 > > I have just pushed it (forgetting that the author is a new committer, > sorry). > > Andreas I saw that ZFS update patch as I was prepping my ZFS package changes for submission--I had the 2.2.4 update as part of the series, and decided to wait until the already-submitted package update landed to send in my ZFS package rework. My package rework is issue #71482, and I think is a better solution since packages like zfs-auto-snapshot depend on the zfs user-space tools. Additionally, the updated ZFS package is only a temporary fix as ZFS 2.2.4 only supports up through Linux 6.8 kernels (and linux-libre 6.9 was recently made the default). Also, thank you Efraim and Leo for a bit of encouragement, which motivated me to finally submit my reworked ZFS packages for upstream inclusion. :) Cheers, Kaelyn P.S. For my patch, I didn't include any calls to 'make-zfs-for-kernel' for any of the linux-libre kernels, since the resulting packages aren't substitutable and the kernel version needed would be use-case dependent.
