Hi Steve, Steve George <st...@futurile.net> skribis:
> On 10 Apr, Ludovic Courtès wrote: [...] >> To be clear (but I guess it’s crystal clear to anyone who’s been around >> long enough :-)), what we need most is someone to keep track of changes, >> coordinate efforts, decide what goes in the branch and what’s postponed >> or moved to a separate branch, and send periodic (weekly) status updates >> over the course of a couple of months. This can (and probably should) >> be done without doing any actual hacking on the branch. > (...) > > This sounds like something I can do: > > - track changes (in branch) > - co-ordinate blocking issues (in bug system) > - co-ordinate with people doing the actual work :-P > - send (periodic) weekly emails > - encourage shipping by minimising scope creep ;-) Awesome, thanks for volunteering! > Sounds like there's already agreement to revert the 'pkgconf' change and push > a new branch without them which becomes 'core-updates'. Josselin on IRC I had > the impression you were working on that? I’m not sure what the situation is (I see Maxim just pushed changes on top of current ‘core-updates’, so maybe it’s OK?). Josselin, Maxim: could you explain what problems there are around pkgconf and what you would recommend? Thanks, Ludo’.
