Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Andreas, > > +guix-devel > > Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> I am reaching out since I am receiving in cc patches for Qt, and realise >> that I do not feel quite confident about them; I added myself because I >> feel able to work on C code, but I think you are much more involved and >> competent for Qt than I and also sufficiently numerous, so I could safely >> remove myself. >> >> But when trying to do so, I realised that the situation is a bit convoluted: >> In addition to a qt team, there is an lxqt team, and I was actually part >> only of the latter; but the two overlap in claiming responsibility for >> gnu/packages/qt.scm. Moreover Maxim is part of qt, and 宋文武 and I are >> part of lxqt. > > I think the reason qt.scm is part of the lxqt team is historical; lxqt-team > predates qt-team. We should probably just remove qt.scm from > lxqt-team's scope. What do you think? > >> So I would suggest to sort this out somehow; maybe merge lxqt into qt? > > I'd keep both team separated; I'm interested in maintaining qt upgrades > but not much lxqt.
Hello, I have just pushed 2 commits to remove qt.scm from the scope of lxqt and add myself to the qt team. Happy weekend!
