Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Attila, > > Attila Lendvai <att...@lendvai.name> writes: > >>> About "cheaper code path when a log level is disabled at runtime", >>> perhaps it can be improved in guile-lib, but otherwise that's a nice >>> list. I just wish we had a good logging library in Guile and could stop >>> reinventing the wheel left and right. >> >> >> i've made my judgement that the logger in guile-lib was never applied >> seriously when i relized that it stores the enabled state in a >> hashtable (which must be looked up for every log statement). >> >> i made sure the log statements have a unique syntax, so the underlying >> machinery can be replaced easily later, and then i moved on. > > I guess if we were serious at giving Scheme/Guile a great logging > library we would try to design it with the help of everyone as a SRFI; > it could then be integrated to Guile and any other Scheme, benefiting > the ecosystem at large. Is this something you could be interested in > trying? I've found the Scheme community around SRFIs very knowledgeable > and helpful. > maybe can see srfi-215 Central Log Exchange [https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-215/srfi-215.html]?
