Hi, On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 13:35:30 +0800, Hilton Chain wrote: > > Hi Felix (and Leo, Cc-ed) > > On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:00:47 +0800, > Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > It's possible Guix never shipped the affected "stable" kernels, but a brief > > pointer seemed appropriate. For details, please see here. [1] > > > > Kind regards > > Felix > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231205122122.dfhhoaswsfscuhc3@quack3/ > > > > From the linked thread and report in Debian[1], 6.1.64 (and maybe 5.10.202 + > 5.15.140) are affected. Unfortunately we have shipped them for about 1 week. > > Leo has sent #67724 yesterday to update kernels, maybe we can merge updates > for these three versions quicker? > > Thanks > --- > [1]: https://micronews.debian.org/2023/1702150551.html
Based on the commit log and [1], the offending commit was not actually included in 5.10.y and 5.15.y releases. And according to [2], a fix has benn added[3] to v6.1.66, so only v6.1.64 and v6.1.65 are affected. Thanks --- [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/2023112502-supernova-copier-7615@gregkh/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/2023120643-evade-legal-ee74@gregkh/ [3]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.1.66&id=ea574927fc0bc343016ea3337fcfc0b3fb26fe08
