Hi Saku, Am Freitag, dem 08.12.2023 um 10:42 +0200 schrieb Saku Laesvuori: > Hi, > > I'm planning on refreshing Guix's haskell packages as my fix for > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66347Â requires rebuilding all of them > anyway. Should I try to keep commits small with only one update per > commit (which is more work but managable if I don't care about the > commits being buildable) or should I try to keep them buildable (i.e. > update everything in one commit)? It is quite certain that most of > them will not build after updating ghc or a subset of their > dependencies, so making many small commits would cause nearly all of > them to be unbuildable. Define "buildable" and "unbuildable". Depending on the context, it may be fine or even required to break dependant packages for a short while and update them along a longer series. However, in each commit at least the package touched in that commit ought to build.
Cheers
