"Tomas Volf" <~@wolfsden.cz> writes: > On 2023-11-02 16:38:29 +0000, Suhail wrote: >> [..] >> -- >> Suhail >> >> This email is not an offer capable of acceptance, does not evidence an >> intention to enter into an agreement, has no operative effect until a >> definitive agreement is signed in writing by both parties, and that no >> party should act in reliance on the email or any representations of the >> sender until a definitive agreement is signed in writing by both >> parties. > > I am unsure what is the takeaway from this paragraph.
I am not a lawyer, so take my interpretation with sufficient grains of salt. To me, the takeaway is that a message with that signature does not constitute a legally binding contract and thus limits liability. > I would suggest not sending a privileged, confidential and/or exempt > from disclosure information to a public mailing list. You're correct. Thank you for catching that. I've gotten rid of the offending clause. -- Suhail This email is not an offer capable of acceptance, does not evidence an intention to enter into an agreement, has no operative effect until a definitive agreement is signed in writing by both parties, and that no party should act in reliance on the email or any representations of the sender until a definitive agreement is signed in writing by both parties.
