Hi, Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, > > On Sun, 08 Oct 2023 at 11:12, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> such as fixes to >> git-minimal (bug#65924) > > Why not also update git-minimal/pinned? > > Well, the idea with git-minimal/pinned (as well as with all /pinned > packages) is to have a variant that is barely updated – barely means a > core-updates round, I guess. :-) It avoids a world rebuild and allows to > update non-pinned variants more frequently. > > Somehow, the update of git-minimal should not be a world rebuild. :-) > > $ guix refresh -l -e '(@@ (gnu packages version-control) git-minimal)' | cut > -f1 -d':' > Building the following 152 packages would ensure 370 dependent packages are > rebuilt > > $ guix refresh -l -e '(@@ (gnu packages version-control) git-minimal/pinned)' > | cut -f1 -d':' > Building the following 2200 packages would ensure 5224 dependent packages are > rebuilt > > Although, the change in bug#65924 also impacts git-minimal/pinned, hence > maybe the world rebuild you are talking about. :-) > > Anyway. Update git-minimal/pinned too? It's simply been overlooked. Would you mind sending a patch? :-) -- Thanks, Maxim
