Hello, Emmanuel Beffara <m...@beffara.org> writes:
> De Nicolas Goaziou le 13/09/2023 à 14:39: >> It may be interesting to compare location and contents of the ls-R files >> in both installations. > > I tried to explore this but I see no reason why the ls-R files would be > ignored I spent some time exploring this, but I cannot tell either. Though, it is plausible that the problem is related to ls-R files, or, more accurately, the reason why they are not read. Note that those files are not installed in every tree. For example `texlive-updmap.cfg' doesn't create any so, IIUC, any TeX Live tree used as a build input require to navigate the file system. I also tried to tweak TEXMFDBS and TEXMF values in "texmf.cnf" from "texlive-libkpathsea" package, but couldn't find a sweet spot. At the moment, I'm running out of ideas, and time. > I do want to contribute to a solution, because right now texlive is > practically unusable in Guix. FWIW, I use modular TeX Live regularly, so "unusable" is probably a bit strong. However, I agree the current situation is frustrating. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
