On 2023-09-20 at 10:21+02:00, Csepp wrote: > It's better if we have at least one *well documented* developer setup, > than if we have a bunch of (sometimes conflicting) partial docs > for setting up certain subsystems. > > Emacs can be pretty good, once you do (setq make-defaults-not-suck 1) > a bunch of times.
Or even more outrageous, an overriden Emacs package with all the good stuff for Guix development. We already have guix shell that spawns a shell and guix edit that spawns an editor, why no guix boot that spawns an OS^W^W Emacs with appropriate defaults? Disclaimer: I use the devil editor that goes by the number of VI VI VI, so take this suggestion with a grain of salt.
