On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 10:56:39AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Vagrant Cascadian <vagr...@debian.org> writes: > > > The only thing clunky about this particular aspect of the workflow > > described is the fact that the guix community (maintainers?) have > > decided on a one patch per mail policy with a cover letter, rather than > > submitting the patches as attachments in the initial mail. > > You are right. When I started contributing I actually did attach all > patches in one email. I wonder why we stopped doing that.
I believe some found it easier to pipe multiple emails to git am than to pipe attachments. From mutt there's no difference for me. > I’ll say that many of my gripes with (the GNU instance of) Debbugs are > due to the fact that we can’t customize it to better suit our needs — it > is a shared resource with a complicated maintenance story. So all > changes went into Mumi as crude workarounds. I think this is a dead end > and we’d be better off leaving the shared GNU instance of Debbugs > behind. -- Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
