Hi, De Nicolas Goaziou le 28/08/2023 à 20:01: > Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > >>> In any case, I suggest to write a proper bug report for this. Hopefully, > >>> someone with better understanding about the implications of GUIX_TEXMF > >>> will be able to solve this. > >> > >> I can do that for the texdoc behaviour. > > By the way, I think I fixed `texdoc' utility. Would you care testing it > after a fresh `guix pull'?
It seems to work fine: now texdoc does find all documentation in the various items in GUIX_TEXMF. So there seems to be no need for a texdoc bug report anymore, thanks! The only subtlety is that any call to guix shell with extra texlive packages should also include texlive-bin (directly or not) so that the proper hooks are called, otherwise GUIX_TEXMF is not updated. This goes beyond the point of documentation, of course. -- Emmanuel
