Hi Guix!
Thank you for feedback, I've sent V2 for https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64201 It was built successfully from the latest master branch check out. Thanks, Oleg On Mon, 24 Jul 2023, 18:36 Sharlatan Hellseher, <sharlata...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > Thank you for your time. > > This issue may be closed https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64287 as Tobias > applied all of it's patches. > I'm not sure about the reason of splittingt them into smaller ones, it > may be a question to him :-) > > I'll rebase patches from https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64201 to the > current master branch and sent V2, hope they are look ok. > > Regards, > Oleg > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 09:53, Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> wrote: > > > > Am Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 10:36:26PM +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > > You’re now well known so pretty much the only thing I would wait for as > > > a reviewer before applying these updates is (1) a green light from > > > qa.guix, > > > > This looks like it lags behind now. > > > > > and (2) a bit of spare time. > > > > Ah, we should not wait for the impossible to happen! ;-) > > > > The status of the patches is unclear to me, it looks as if some of them > > have been rewritten and merged by Tobias (maybe this also confuses QA? > > do the patches still apply?) But I find it difficult to understand what > > needs to be done still. For instance, there is a patch "stuff: Update to > > 1.26.0-0.9008dc0", but it is already at version 2.0.1 in master. > > > > How about sending a second version for the remaining patches on top of > > current master? > > > > Andreas > > > > > -- > > … наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна > найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но > совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости. >
