Hi Maxim, On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 5:48 PM Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > When you rewrite the > history (by using rebase, say), the existing signatures of the rewritten > (rebased) commits are replaced with new ones generated from your key.
That was probably a misunderstanding. I meant to suggest with some trepidation that 'master' is merged into the feature branch, and then the feature branch is merged back into 'master'. I thought the two merge commits would be signed by the person performing the merges while the "origin seal" of the accepted change is also preserved. Please forgive me. I merely hoped to find common ground but apparently added confusion rather than clarity. Kind regards Felix
