Hi, Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hi Christopher, >> >> Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> writes: >> >>> guix-comm...@gnu.org writes: >>> >>>> apteryx pushed a commit to branch master >>>> in repository guix. >>>> >>>> commit ec9f15b158300da3a77ce02cd2267222f435e80f >>>> Author: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> >>>> AuthorDate: Tue Jun 6 12:12:40 2023 -0400 >>>> >>>> gnu: wxwidgets: Add libxtst to inputs. >>>> >>>> WxWidgets was already built with XTest support, but mostly by luck, via >>>> propagation of libxtst from GTK's propagated at-spi2-core package. >>>> Make it an >>>> explicit input. >>>> >>>> * gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm (wxwidgets) [inputs]: Add libxtst. >>>> --- >>>> gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> Did this need to go straight to the master branch? >>> >>> → guix refresh -l wxwidgets >>> Building the following 217 packages would ensure 456 dependent packages are >>> rebuilt: ... >>> >>> That to me says this should go to staging. >> >> Correct. Except there's no staging branch anymore. I guess we should >> create one? :-) > > You're the second person to mention this. I guess I view the branch not > existing as a minor technical detail that doesn't really change what > you'd do. I remember we were very happy to get rid of the staging branch last time we managed to merge it -- I was naively hoping we'd have ironed out the new team-based branching processes soon enough to not have to recreate staging/core-updates anew; I guess I'm not alone :-). Which reminds me, I need to take a look at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63459, which I'll try to do soon. -- Thanks, Maxim
