On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:11:47AM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 05:56:52PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > > Am Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 09:33:31AM +0000 schrieb pukkamustard: > > > A hunch: This might have something to do with Zig not properly > > > supporting glibc 2.35: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/12808 > > > > Thanks, this looks like a good explanation of the problem, but I do not > > quite see what could be a solution... I see a string of issues of the form > > "add support for targeting glibc ..." > > https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/12808 > > https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/12809 > > https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/14798 > > but all of them are open. > > > > We may have to do without zig in the foreseeable future... > > > > They just added a tag for the next release. We can wait.
We may have to backport whatever fix they do, it looks like 0.11 is going to use their new bootstrap chain, with a pre-compiled zig wasm binary. -- Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
