Hi, Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> skribis:
> On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 17:56, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >>> Thanks for the feedback. I wonder if some are of the opinion that since >>> gexp->derivation is a plain function rather than a syntax having a >>> special form for its 2nd argument, we should leave the default >>> indentation rules untouched for it? >> >> Yes, that’s my take and current practice so far: special rules for >> special forms (macros), not for procedures. > > What is the rationale? Being able to know directly at the location when > it is a plain function or a special form? Yes. Now, it’s aesthetics so there’s no “rationale” per se but rather established practice: in the project, but also from what I can see in Guile and more generally Scheme (info "(guix) Formatting Code"). Ludo’.
