Hi Felix, Felix Lechner <felix.lech...@lease-up.com> writes:
> Hi Maxim, > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 8:53 AM Maxim Cournoyer > <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> In the future, try to remember using the --subject-prefix='PATCH >> core-updates', to avoid committers mistakenly pushing this to master > > Thank you for your response! I wrote for guidance on that issue. I am > sorry that was unclear from my message. > > With the core-updates process now abandoned, I retitled the issue to Could you share the reference of that? I'm not against it, but our currently documented process still mention the good old staging and core-updates branches. > "[PATCH wip-inetutils 0/4] gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4". > > Does that work for you? > > I am happy to retitle as "core-updates" as you suggested, if that's > what you want. Of course, you can also retitle it in any way you think > is best. Until everybody has a good grasp of the new process, I think sticking to the documented one may be best for now, as it makes it clear that this cause a mass rebuild and shouldn't land to master. -- Thanks, Maxim
