Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> writes: > Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> writes: > >> Julien Lepiller <jul...@lepiller.eu> writes: >> >>> As discussed at Guix Days before Fosdem, we haven't merged core-updates >>> in a very long time. I'd volunteer to lead this effort, but I don't >>> know what steps I should follow. Do we have some documentation about >>> that? >> >> I can try and help with this, at least in terms of helping get >> bordeaux.guix.gnu.org substitute availability to a good level. >> >> I'd also like to get the kind of comparison that the qa-frontpage can do >> for patches working for branches, but that'll probably take a bit of >> work in the data service/qa-frontpage to get working smoothly. > > I've now addressed some performance issues with data.qa.guix.gnu.org, > which means that the comparisons for core-updates (and branches like it) > should now work, even if they're still a bit slow. > > This has enabled qa.guix.gnu.org to submit builds to the bordeaux build > farm, they're still being slowly submitted but things have already > started to happen for aarch64-linux at least. > > Once there's enough build data to work with, I'll see if I can start > getting some information to show up on qa.guix.gnu.org.
Christopher thanks a million for your work on bordeaux and qa.guix.gnu.org! It's awesome that guix is moving towards having a QA assurance that new patches won't break testsuitse! Thanks again! Joshua
