Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > > Julien Lepiller <jul...@lepiller.eu> writes: > >> Le Sun, 12 Feb 2023 12:52:51 +0100, >> Julien Lepiller <jul...@lepiller.eu> a écrit : >> >>> Le Sun, 12 Feb 2023 12:06:14 +0100, >>> Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> a écrit : >>> >>> I just tried to build mpc on my machine, from core-updates. I get the >>> same derivation as the one shown on the data service, and it built >>> fine. Maybe there's something wrong with the machines behind bordeaux? >>> I probably got substitutes from berlin, for gcc and friends (though I >>> built gmp, mpfr and mpc). >> >> And I was able to rebuild (with --check) patch-mesboot. The error looks >> a lot like https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49985. We should fix that indeed >> :) > > It could be something "wrong" with a build machine, although my > suspicion for a while is that various things are broken/don't work on > btrfs, which milano-guix-1 (the most important x86_64-linux) build > machine uses. > > I've filed a few issues that probably relate to this: > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53415 > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53416 > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/60202 > > There are other build machines that don't use btrfs, so it should be > possible to get these things built anyway.
Following up on this, there are some failed builds for patch-mesboot [1] for the latest revision of core-updates [2]. 1: https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/3nidliz9rdxwvvl46i0afvwkfx4yly74-patch-mesboot-2.5.9.drv 2: https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/revision/3b57f25f55c52c97428106de285d3cf2746554dc I've tried this manually on milano-guix-1 (which uses btrfs) and I get the same failure, so this seems to be specific to the machine/configuration. Thanks, Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
