Hello!

Over the course of a few years, the size of our packages has apparently
kept growing.  Example:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Should packages with smaller closures be preferred as package inputs, in the case that multiple packages implement the same interface?

For example, pkgconf is much simpler compared to pkg-config but implements the same interface. Should it be used as an input for all packages that need pkg-config, through a pkg-config symlink in the pkgconf package for complete compatibility? If not, why? Are there more important factors to consider than bootstrapping complexity?

In contrast, pkg-config has glib as a bundled dependency when it should be unbundled. There's probably a circular dependency that needs to be resolved but it needs to be done.



Reply via email to