Hi,

Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> A side-note, it seems that Ludovic has been
>> working toward eliminating the use of match patterns matching the fields
>> directly, instead encouraging the use of 'match-record', see
>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59390.  I haven't checked if this is
>> compatible with define-configuration records though.
>
> It is: ‘define-configuration’ builds on ‘define-record-type*’, which
> builds on SRFI-9, which builds on Guile “records”, which builds on Guile
> “structs”.  :-)

Excellent!  Thanks for having confirmed that.

-- 
Maxim

Reply via email to