Hi, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> A side-note, it seems that Ludovic has been >> working toward eliminating the use of match patterns matching the fields >> directly, instead encouraging the use of 'match-record', see >> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59390. I haven't checked if this is >> compatible with define-configuration records though. > > It is: ‘define-configuration’ builds on ‘define-record-type*’, which > builds on SRFI-9, which builds on Guile “records”, which builds on Guile > “structs”. :-) Excellent! Thanks for having confirmed that. -- Maxim