Hi, zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> skribis:
> About the channel information to include in a published paper, yeah > Skribilo/Guix is one (non-straightforwardly?) way to get “guix describe > -f channels”. ;-) Sure, one can achieve the same thing without Skribilo. > Is it possible to have a Skribilo reader which would use less > parenthesis? Similar to Racket Scribble? Definitely, there’s already a couple of them and we could add one with a syntax similar to Texinfo or Scribble. > Well, if I understand correctly, «the context of reproducible research > workflows» somehow means using Skribilo as authoring system for > producing “active papers“, right? Right. > PS: About the name/version pairs, are we not trying to explain at length > that it is the wrong way to obtain reproducibility? Aside it is not > clear what is the depth of name/version pairs to provide when speaking > about reproducibility, no? Indeed! :-) We can do both: explain why it’s wrong and provide a way to do it for those who want/need to do it anyway. Ludo’.
