Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> writes:
> Quick note: > > On 1 October 2022 17:29:03 UTC, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote: >>If substitutable was merely a hint that a daemon could be free to ignore >>it wouldn’t be any worse than downloading a substitute vs building >>something locally. > > Substitutability has legal implications in Guix, whether or not it > shouldn't. Any 'suggestion' would have to be a third state. Just > something to factor into the decision. Yes, I was about to mention that. In my scenario I have two machines, one building stuff the other only substituting. The serving machine would be the one deciding whether to enforce substitutability or not. -- Ricardo
