On +2022-06-29 09:29:20 +0200, zimoun wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the feed back > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 08:07, b...@bokr.com wrote: > > > Anyway, the idea is to make the Subject: line greppable for both > > what the bug is about and its status when it was closed. > > I agree that it is hard to work with the Debbugs archive. What you are > asking seems possible with Debbugs but the GNU instance is not > supporting many tags [1]. Using the ’Subject:’ line as tagging system > could be a workaround but I am not convinced the ratio effort / > usefulness is worth because it is too error-prone, IMHO. > > Arun has presented nice ideas about improving Mumi and it appears to me > the direction to go. > > > 1: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/Developer.html#tags>
Thanks, that LGTM: Looks like easy-to-parse html :) This looks interesting too, that I just found: 2: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-request.html#introduction> Will have to try it. Maybe emacs already has a mode for that? (I need to refresh my emacs-fu ;/ ) > > > Cheers, > simon -- Regards, Bengt Richter
