> This sounds like it could take quite some time, and the work it performs > is not transactional, so an impatient person cancelling it before > completion could end up with a bunch of “initial” emails without ever > sending the rest of the patches.
True. > I think that maybe we should wean mumi off of debbugs and operate on > received email directly (using debbugs as a storage backend for the time > being). Weaning mumi off of debbugs is definitely the better approach, but it would take more mork, I imagine.
