Hi! Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis:
> Arun Isaac <arunis...@systemreboot.net> writes: > >> Hi Ludo, >> >>> The attached super-early-draft ‘guix review’ script fetches mboxes from >>> mumi—that part is OK. >> >> I like the idea! But, could we put this in mumi instead of guix? That >> way, other packages that use debbugs/mumi (skribilo comes to mind), can >> benefit from it as well. Something like >> >> $ guix shell mumi -- mumi review 54874 > > I also think it would be a good fit for mumi. Yes, there are good arguments for having it in mumi. One of them is that we can make the server and client-side work hand-in-hand. An argument in favor of having such a tool in Guix is that we could have Guix-specific tooling layered on top, such as listing the set of new/upgraded packages, automatically building them, things like that. But look: we could have a generic ‘mumi review’ that a hypothetical ‘guix review’ could use as a library and extend. At any rate, anything will be better than the status quo, so I’m all for starting with a simple ‘mumi review’! Perhaps we should organize a hacking session or something eventually? Thanks, Ludo’.
